T
drc4dentistry.drtalya.com
DRC4DENTISTRY.COM · Master of Orthodontics · 4th Edition
Module 13 · Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension

Vertical Discrepancies

A Clinical View on Open Bite & Deep Bite

Dr. Talya Young·25+ Years of Clinical Orthodontic Excellence

The Vertical Dimension · Two Views

Structural View
The Vertical Dimension · full module
AFundamentals of the Vertical DimensionContext
BVertical Diagnosis & CephalometricsCovered
CVertical Discrepancies Covered
DVertical Control in Treatment MechanicsCovered
ESurgical Management of Vertical ProblemsNot covered
FStability & Retention of Vertical CorrectionCovered
Clinical View
this presentation
Vertical Discrepancies
C1 Open Bite
C2 Deep Bite
disease by disease, end to end
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 20262 / 33
Part 1

Foundations of Open & Deep Bite

Diagnosis, facial pattern & the cephalometric toolkit

Level AFundamentals

The Vertical Paradigm

Hyperdivergent open bite vs hypodivergent deep bite — skull diagram
1Hyperdivergent open bite vs hypodivergent deep bite, skull diagram
Tweed analysis: the Frankfort–mandibular plane angle (FMA) triangle that defines the vertical growth axis
2Tweed analysis: the Frankfort–mandibular plane angle (FMA) triangle that defines the vertical growth axis
  • Core rule: everything in orthodontics is extrusive, vertical control is the organising idea
  • Low angle (square jaw, deep bite) → molar extrusion + mandibular translation
  • High angle (open-bite tendency) → molar intrusion + mandibular autorotation
  • High angle: never run Cl II elastics, only short Cl II and anterior trapezoid
  • Easiest: low-angle / deep-bite / dental
  • Hardest: high-angle / open-bite / dental
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 20264 / 33
Level BDiagnosis & Cephalometrics

Diagnosis: Facial Pattern & Long Face

Class II high-angle open bite — lateral facial profile
3Class II high-angle open bite, lateral facial profile
Björk analysis: saddle, articular & gonial angles predict the direction of mandibular growth rotation
4Björk analysis: saddle, articular & gonial angles predict the direction of mandibular growth rotation
  • Dental vs skeletal: localise & quantify; dentoalveolar compensation can mask severe skeletal discrepancy
  • Long-face Type I, environmental: mouth breathing, open-mouth posture (adenoids / tonsils / deviated septum)
  • Long-face Type II, genetic: short upper lip, VME (excessive downward maxillary growth)
  • Long-face Type III: short ramus height, antigonial notch, steep MP, backward (clockwise) rotation
  • Hyperdivergent: FMA >28°, SN-MP >32°; dolichofacial; open-bite tendency; low bite force
  • Hypodivergent: FMA <25°, SN-MP <32°; brachycephalic; deep overbite; strong masseter
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 20265 / 33
Level BDiagnosis & Cephalometrics

Cephalometric Toolkit, Vertical

Cephalometric landmarks and planes — standard tracing
5Cephalometric landmarks and planes, standard tracing
Hard-tissue cephalometric landmarks (S, N, Or, Po, A, B, ANS, PNS, Go, Gn, Me) on a lateral tracing
6Hard-tissue cephalometric landmarks (S, N, Or, Po, A, B, ANS, PNS, Go, Gn, Me) on a lateral tracing
Y-axis (S-Gn / FH)
59° ± 6<53 counter-CW / brachycephalic; >65 clockwise / dolicho
FMA (FH–MP)
<25° hypo; >28° hyperhyperdivergent MP >30° = long-face syndrome (33.3)
SN-MP
<32° hypo; >32° hypercorroborates FMA
MMPA (Mx–Mn planes)
27° ± 4>27° open-bite tendency; <27° deep-bite tendency (Millett)
Jarabak ratio (PFH/AFH)
posterior at fault → skeletalanterior at fault → postural
NSBa / Saddle angle
>135° vertical growth~118° brachycephalic
LAFH (% total face)
35% normal<35% decreased; >35% increased
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 20266 / 33
Part 2

Open Bite

Etiology, the Sato model, closure mechanics & stability

Level C1Open Bite

Anterior Open Bite: Definition & Prevalence

Frontal intraoral view showing anterior open bite gap
7Frontal intraoral view showing anterior open bite gap
  • Definition (Carabelli/Sato): incisors fail to overlap vertically; occlusal planes do not meet at incisor level
  • Peak age: most common 8–10 y in the mixed dentition
  • Prevalence: ~4% of schoolchildren and adolescents
  • Self-correction: ~50% of 3-year-olds show AOB; most resolve once sucking habits cease
  • Sustained AOB in permanent dentition is not self-correcting
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 20268 / 33
Level C1Open Bite

Etiology: Local vs General Factors

Tongue thrust/posture, rests between incisors, disrupts muscular equilibrium
Digit/pacifier sucking, inhibits alveolar growth, increases AOB risk
Mouth breathing, nasal/adenoid obstruction forces tongue down, posterior over-eruption
Macroglossia / muscular hypotonicity, molar over-eruption, alveolar separation
Genetics & congenital, disturb size, shape, proportion of skeletal structures
Lip morphology & tone, absent lip seal allows tongue to unbalance occlusion
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 20269 / 33
Level C1Open Bite

Classification of Open Bite

Diagram contrasting open bite vs overbite/overjet at incisor level
8Diagram contrasting open bite vs overbite/overjet at incisor level
  • False/dental: teeth proclined, osseous bases normal, not beyond canines
  • True/skeletal: alveolar processes deformed, dolicho/hyperdivergent, increased lower facial third
  • By zone: anterior / posterior / complete
  • Anterior subtypes: dental (eruption impediment) vs skeletal (posterior facial growth)
  • Early Tx types (23.1): Type I simple dental · Type II combined · Type III dentoskeletal
  • Severity: incomplete / simple / complex / compound
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202610 / 33
Level BDiagnosis & Cephalometrics

Cephalometric Differential Diagnosis

AB-Maxillo-Mandibular Triangle: decreased ODI with flat occlusal plane
9AB-Maxillo-Mandibular Triangle: decreased ODI with flat occlusal plane
Downs analysis: the Y-axis (S–Gn to Frankfort) and mandibular plane angle quantify the open-bite / vertical tendency
10Downs analysis: the Y-axis (S–Gn to Frankfort) and mandibular plane angle quantify the open-bite / vertical tendency
  • Localise with MP/PP angle (~30° in normal occlusion; occlusal plane bisects it equally)
  • Normal molars + incisor under-eruption → anterior dental cause only
  • Over-eruption maxillary molars → posterior maxillary cause
  • Over-eruption mandibular molars → posterior mandibular cause
  • Low ODI (< 67°) = open-bite tendency; low APDI (< 77°) = Class II frame
  • Hyperdivergent signs: steep MP, large gonial angle, short ramus, antegonial notch
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202611 / 33
Level C1Open Bite

Sato Model: Posterior Discrepancy

Cephalometric superimposition showing backward mandibular rotation and posterior molar eruption
11Cephalometric superimposition showing backward mandibular rotation and posterior molar eruption
  • Prime cause: molar over-eruption + mesial tipping alters the posterior occlusal plane (POP)
  • Born Class II → normal vertical molar increase → POP flattens → forward mandibular rotation → Class I
  • Insufficient vertical → mandible cannot rotate forward → opens (Class II high-angle AOB)
  • Excessive vertical → strong forward rotation → prognathism with AOB (Class III)
  • POP steeper → backward mandibular rotation; POP flatter → forward rotation + TMJ decompression
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202612 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

Closure Mechanics I: Principles

Force-arrow diagram: molar intrusion and anterior extrusion mechanics
12Force-arrow diagram: molar intrusion and anterior extrusion mechanics
  • Extrusion closes fast (~1 mm/month) but is UNSTABLE; leave arch 2–4 months after closure
  • Posterior intrusion is slower but more stable; scissor effect: 1 mm posterior bite block → >3 mm anterior opening
  • In-block extrusion bend: 0.5–1 mm step; force 800–1000 g; pain + root-resorption risk
  • Individual extrusion: 30–40 g per upper incisor, 20 g per lower incisor
  • Bypass arches (NiTi/TMA 0.012–0.020"): 1–2 mm/month, no tip/torque control
  • Vertical-pull chin cup (VCC): growth control in the high-angle open bite, restrains vertical growth & drives forward autorotation, prevents molar extrusion, ~12 h/day ± posterior bite block
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202613 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

Closure Mechanics II: Appliances

Posterior bite block (acrylic)
9–12 yintrusion 0.25–0.5 mm/month; 24 h/day 6–8 mo; mandibular autorotation
TMA spring intrusion plate
helicoidal 0.032" TMAAOB ≤ 6 mm; less violent than acrylic block; 9–12 y
High-pull headgear
≥ 16 h/dayforce through maxillary CoR, 4 mm above 1st molar apices; intrudes upper molars
TPA with intrusion button
~80 g1 mm per 2–3 months; tongue presses disc on swallowing; cement 2–3 mm from palate
Intermaxillary/anterior elastics
2–6.5 oz; 1/8–5/16"replaced every 12 h; 1 mm/month; rect. wire 0.017 × 0.025" preferred
TAD/AOB splint + mini-screws
skeletal anchoragereliable molar/premolar intrusion where conventional mechanics fail
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202614 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

MEAW Approach

MEAW multiloop archwire with tip-back bends and vertical elastic hooks
13MEAW multiloop archwire with tip-back bends and vertical elastic hooks
  • Wire: 0.016 × 0.022" Elgiloy in 0.018 slot; L-loops at every interproximal space
  • Tip-back bends: 2–3° per tooth, cumulate to 15–20°; upright buccal segments; control POP
  • Elastics: 3/16", 6 oz, ANTERIOR ONLY, never in molar zone (molar elastics cause over-eruption)
  • Extract third molars in ALL AOB cases (never premolars, Sato: no P1 extractions in ~40 y)
  • Class II elastics abandoned: move anterior back + posterior forward, oppose desired forward mandibular adaptation
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202615 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

Course Emphasis: Detorque, Don't Extrude

  • Close by detorquing, not extrusion: lower incisor extrusion + upper incisor detorque + posterior intrusion
  • Pitts technique: high-torque brackets inverted on 1 & 2 to close AOB without extruding incisors
  • Cleats behind lower incisors to improve tongue posture and control torque
  • Lingual arch (lower) to prevent molar extrusion
  • AOB splint (acrylic + mini-screws TAD anchorage) for reliable molar intrusion
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202616 / 33
Level FStability & Retention

Surgery & Stability

Intraoral treatment series A–F: open bite case from pre-treatment through retention
14Intraoral treatment series A–F: open bite case from pre-treatment through retention
  • Le Fort I maxillary impaction → mandibular autorotation; bite closes in hours
  • Indications: AOB > 6 mm + high MP + weak chin → impaction + BSSO
  • AOB surgical relapse: highest at 42.9%, because occlusal planes not corrected, molars not leveled
  • Non-surgical stability: correct the vertical dimension; results hold at 10–16 y follow-up
  • Pre-surgical prep: heavy arches, surgical hooks; models every 6 months during presurgical Tx
  • Stability key: upright the buccal segment (~15° → 4.5 mm space/side); short retainer 3–6 months
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202617 / 33
Part 3

Deep Bite

Classification, intrusion mechanics, forces & decision-making

Level C2Deep Bite

Deep Bite: Definition & Norms

Initial deep bite, pronounced overbite pre-treatment
15Initial deep bite, pronounced overbite pre-treatment
  • Overbite norm: 2–3 mm; percentage more accurate (crown-length variation)
  • Nanda: 25–40% acceptable if TMJ function sound
  • Neff: 20% ideal; 33.3: 5–20% normal range
  • Deep curve of Spee: hallmark of dental deep bite
  • Freeway space: 2–4 mm, must be preserved after bite opening
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202619 / 33
Level C2Deep Bite

Deep Bite Classification

Deep bite: full upper incisor coverage of lower anteriors
16Deep bite: full upper incisor coverage of lower anteriors
  • Dental (simple): teeth/alveolar only, acquired, deep curve of Spee, normal vertical skeleton
  • Skeletal (complex): basal malrelationship, hereditary, two-step occlusion, high relapse
  • Skeletal signs: reduced LAFH, long PFH, small gonial angle, short broad symphysis
  • Brachy pattern: counterclockwise mandible rotation, convergent facial planes
  • Dental cause: molar infraocclusion and/or incisor over-eruption (or combination)
  • Cl II Div 2: most frequent clinical association with deep bite
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202620 / 33
Level AFundamentals

Neuromuscular Basis & Consequences

  • Posterior vertical chain: masseter, temporalis, internal pterygoid, anteriorly positioned & strong → deep bite
  • Mechanism: strong anterior position depresses dentition, blocks posterior eruption
  • Periodontal: occlusal overload, traumatic overbite, circumscribed radiolucencies (Roque)
  • TMJ: condyles forced backward/upward in fossa, clenching, disc displacement, headache
  • Incisal consequences: labial migration, wear of mandibular incisors, maxillary anterior spacing
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202621 / 33
Level BDiagnosis & Cephalometrics

Cephalometric Localisation

Cephalometric tracing with palatal, occlusal & mandibular planes overlaid
17Cephalometric tracing with palatal, occlusal & mandibular planes overlaid
Jarabak analysis: the posterior/anterior facial height ratio (PFH/AFH) localises the vertical pattern
18Jarabak analysis: the posterior/anterior facial height ratio (PFH/AFH) localises the vertical pattern
  • Key comparison: palatal-plane/OP angle vs mandibular-plane/OP angle
  • PP/OP > MP/OP: maxillary incisor over-eruption or maxillary molar intrusion
  • PP/OP < MP/OP: mandibular incisor over-eruption or mandibular molar intrusion
  • Low-angle signs: decreased MP angle, large ramus, small gonial angle (FMA < 25°, SN-MP < 32°)
  • Jarabak ratio: PFH/AFH, posterior fault → skeletal; anterior fault → postural
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202622 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

Treatment Principles: Four Levers

Lever 1: intrude maxillary incisors, incompetent lips, gummy smile, steep MP
Lever 2: intrude mandibular incisors, over-erupted lower anteriors
Lever 3: extrude maxillary posteriors, increase LAFH, improve convexity
Lever 4: extrude mandibular posteriors, Cl II Div 2, reduced AFH
Gate, lips: incompetent → intrude anteriors; competent → extrude posteriors
Key rule: 1 mm posterior extrusion = 2.5 mm anterior face-height increase (avoid high-angle)
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202623 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

Force Specifications

Intrusion (Gottlieb)
15–20 g/incisorno root resorption
Intrusion bend (upper)
30–40 g/incisorsecond-order bend
Intrusion bend (lower)
20 g/incisornegative root torque
Tip-back bend
100–125 g total; 15–20 g/tooth0.017×0.025 SS, 45°
CIA (Connecticut)
40–60 g; 1 mm / 6 wkNiTi, continuous
Utility arch
~80–100 g lower / ~140 g upper100 g/cm² root surface
Reverse-curve arch
300–400 g continuousGregoret: negative torque
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202624 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

Intrusion Appliances I

Curve of Spee in upper arch fully engaged for deep-bite levelling
19Curve of Spee in upper arch fully engaged for deep-bite levelling
  • Anterior bite plane / Hawley: disoccludes posteriors → passive eruption; scissor effect 1 mm extrusion = 2–3 mm bite opening
  • Bite turbos: resin on palatal upper incisors, comfortable, hygienic; 6.5 oz elastics q24 h
  • Growth-direction rule: favourable hypodivergent; contraindicated hyperdivergent
  • Cl II Div 2: turbos procline retroclined incisors (reversing incline plane)
  • Utility arch (Ricketts 2×4): 45° tip-back + negative torque ~10–15° → pure incisor intrusion
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202625 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

Intrusion Appliances II

Deep-bite patient: Spee curve wire during incisor retraction phase
20Deep-bite patient: Spee curve wire during incisor retraction phase
  • Burstone segmented arch: 0.018×0.022 SS, ~3 mm helix anterior to molar tube, pure anterior intrusion
  • Reverse-curve / anti-Spee (Gregoret): negative torque seats apices in trabecular bone → intrusion without proclination
  • Round reverse-curve: 300–400 g continuous, suits brachycephalic, intrudes + proclines (no root control)
  • Intrusion arch with loops: 5–7 mm vertical loop, 20 g/tooth, 2–3 months; negative torque essential
  • Lip bumper: corrects curve of Spee, distalises/uprights molars, lip dysfunction cases
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202626 / 33
Level DTreatment Mechanics

TAD Intrusion & Alexander Discipline

VSD .017×.025 steel arch adapted for curve-of-Spee implementation
21VSD .017×.025 steel arch adapted for curve-of-Spee implementation
Best lower incisor intrusion
TMA 17×25 + loop tied between incisorsstable, less tipping, less resorption
Force: intermittent light
15–30 g/toothcontinuous → resorption risk
Sydney Intrusion Spring (SIS)
~400 g at 5 mm activationzygomatic plate anchorage
Alexander/Werneck prescription
0.018" slot, 0.017×0.025 SSposterior anchorage unit key
TAD lower intrusion
1.5 × 8 mm between canines–incisorspower chain to pretorqued wire
Distal jet / Beneslider
palatal TADs — 1 mm/monthPAOO: 1 mm/week
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202627 / 33
Level FStability & Retention

Decision Pearls & Stability

Ten-year post-treatment result with excellent interdigitation
22Ten-year post-treatment result with excellent interdigitation
  • Extraction controversy (Viazis): premolar extraction lingualises remaining teeth → deepens bite, avoid
  • Bite plane: favourable hypodivergent (0.5 mm posterior clearance); contraindicated hyperdivergent
  • Skeletal deep bite: high relapse, hereditary pattern; combined surgical–orthodontic if severe adult
  • Stability: correct CR = CO at end of treatment; lower inter-canine width must not be expanded
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202628 / 33
Part 4

Synthesis

Stability of vertical correction & the master decision gate

Level FStability & Retention

Retention & Stability of Vertical Correction

  • Intrusion is more stable than extrusion, prefer upper incisor intrusion over extrusion; decide based on VME
  • Real retainer = correcting the vertical dimension / occlusal plane (Sato), not an appliance
  • Anterior open bite is the least stable correction; greater skeletal contribution → poorer prognosis
  • Habit / airway / myofunctional follow-through essential: break digit-sucking / tongue-thrust first; screen airway
  • Leave the arch passive after closure; avoid jiggling forces (root resorption risk)
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202630 / 33
Level FStability & Retention

Decision Framework: Master Gate

HIGH angle → intrude posteriors → mandibular autorotation → TADs / intrusion arch / AOB splint
LOW angle → extrude posteriors → mandibular translation → anterior bite plane / functional appliance
1 mm posterior extrusion = 2.5 mm ↑ AFH, never extrude in high-angle patients
Lip competence modifies: incompetent → intrude anteriors; competent → extrude posteriors
Growth direction modifies: forward rotator benefits from posterior extrusion; backward rotator does not
Surgery gate (adults): >6 mm open bite + steep MP + weak chin → Le Fort I impaction ± BSSO
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202631 / 33

Image Credits & Sources

1
Hyperdivergent open bite vs hypodivergent deep bite, skull diagram
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
2
Tweed analysis: the Frankfort–mandibular plane angle (FMA) triangle that defines the vertical growth axis
Phulari BS. An Atlas on Cephalometric Landmarks (2013)
3
Class II high-angle open bite, lateral facial profile
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
4
Björk analysis: saddle, articular & gonial angles predict the direction of mandibular growth rotation
Phulari BS. An Atlas on Cephalometric Landmarks (2013)
5
Cephalometric landmarks and planes, standard tracing
Millett & Welbury. Orthodontics & Paediatric Dentistry, Colour Guide (2000)
6
Hard-tissue cephalometric landmarks (S, N, Or, Po, A, B, ANS, PNS, Go, Gn, Me) on a lateral tracing
WAW Course: Vertical Parameters & Growth Prediction (course slides)
7
Frontal intraoral view showing anterior open bite gap
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
8
Diagram contrasting open bite vs overbite/overjet at incisor level
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
9
AB-Maxillo-Mandibular Triangle: decreased ODI with flat occlusal plane
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
10
Downs analysis: the Y-axis (S–Gn to Frankfort) and mandibular plane angle quantify the open-bite / vertical tendency
Phulari BS. An Atlas on Cephalometric Landmarks (2013)
11
Cephalometric superimposition showing backward mandibular rotation and posterior molar eruption
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
12
Force-arrow diagram: molar intrusion and anterior extrusion mechanics
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
13
MEAW multiloop archwire with tip-back bends and vertical elastic hooks
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
14
Intraoral treatment series A–F: open bite case from pre-treatment through retention
Sato S. Open Bite: Different Types & Treatment (2013)
15
Initial deep bite, pronounced overbite pre-treatment
Werneck. Alexander's Discipline: A Simple Decision (2009)
16
Deep bite: full upper incisor coverage of lower anteriors
Werneck. Alexander's Discipline: A Simple Decision (2009)
17
Cephalometric tracing with palatal, occlusal & mandibular planes overlaid
Werneck. Alexander's Discipline: A Simple Decision (2009)
18
Jarabak analysis: the posterior/anterior facial height ratio (PFH/AFH) localises the vertical pattern
Phulari BS. An Atlas on Cephalometric Landmarks (2013)
19
Curve of Spee in upper arch fully engaged for deep-bite levelling
Werneck. Alexander's Discipline: A Simple Decision (2009)
20
Deep-bite patient: Spee curve wire during incisor retraction phase
Werneck. Alexander's Discipline: A Simple Decision (2009)
21
VSD .017×.025 steel arch adapted for curve-of-Spee implementation
Werneck. Alexander's Discipline: A Simple Decision (2009)
22
Ten-year post-treatment result with excellent interdigitation
Werneck. Alexander's Discipline: A Simple Decision (2009)
© Dr. Talya Young · DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics 4th Ed. · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension · Vertical Discrepancies · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 202632 / 33
Dr. Talya Young
Dr. Talya Young

25+ Years of Clinical Orthodontic Excellence

Specialist in Orthodontics · Educator
Niederdorfstrasse 61
8001 Zurich, Switzerland
[email protected]
www.drtalya.com
+41 76 525 45 78
drc4dentistry.drtalya.com
DRC4DENTISTRY · Master of Orthodontics, 4th Edition · Module 13, Treatment of Excessive Vertical Dimension
Vertical Discrepancies, A Clinical View on Open Bite & Deep Bite · Warsaw Presidential Hotel · June 2026
Warsaw Presidential Hotel
33 / 33